‘Medicare for All’ is a dire threat to Medicare for retirees

Baby boomers beware. If you are in your 50s or 60s, and you are counting on Medicare to pay your future hospital bills, you might be in for a shock. Medicare Part A — the fund that pays hospitals and nursing homes — is running out of money.

A mere seven years from now, it will no longer have enough to pay your providers’ bills in full. The Medicare trustees sounded the alarm in June, urging Congress to act “as soon as possible” to protect people “already ­dependent” on the program.

Good advice, but don’t expect most politicians to take it. The Democrats running for president are in fantasy land, proposing to expand Medicare to millions of younger people or even to the entire population through Medicare for All. Never mind Medicare’s insolvency. That’s like a family that can’t pay its mortgage out shopping for a mega-mansion.

Amazingly, in four national ­debates so far, not one moderator has asked the presidential wannabes how they would ­secure Medicare’s finances and keep the promise the nation has made to seniors. As if 65-and-overs don’t count. Message to the Democratic Party: If they don’t count, don’t count on their votes.

Millennials also should be outraged. If Medicare falters, they will be choosing between sending their kids to camp and paying for Grandma’s hip replacement.

Fortunately, President Trump is stressing the urgency of “securing and improving” Medicare to avert a meltdown. His budget slows the growth in Medicare spending by trimming what hospitals and other institutions are paid. Another change will allow knee replacements to be performed at ambulatory surgery centers, which are lower cost. The idea is to stretch the money in the Medicare Insurance Fund and make it last longer.

Predictably, Trump’s political opponents are trying to torpedo his efforts. A new digital ad by the Democratic-leaning group Priorities USA in battleground states like Michigan claims Trump is cutting Medicare “just to pay for tax cuts for billionaires.” It is a blatant lie, and even the left-leaning Washington Post and PolitiFact admit that.

Medicare Part A is funded through a payroll tax paid by employers and employees. As soon as the tax is collected, it’s spent. Today’s workers and employers fund health care for today’s seniors. Trouble is, there are too many boomers retiring, compared with the number of workers paying the tab.

Economists have predicted the shortfall for years. During the 2012 presidential election, when Republican vice-presidential candidate Paul Ryan proposed Medicare reform, Democrats ran a TV ad depicting him gruesomely rolling a wheelchair bound granny off a cliff. The bitter lesson was: Demagoguery works. Don’t level with voters about the problem. Just make big, impossible promises.

That was eight years ago. Since then, Washington’s cowardly politicians have done nothing.

Shoring up the program will require either curbing benefit costs, hiking the payroll tax or inching up the eligibility age to slow enrollment growth.

The longer politicians dither, the fewer options remain. A ­decade ago, the most painless approach was to raise the eligibility age of 65 by a month each year, so that 12 years after the ­reform was launched, the eligibility age would be 66. This gradual approach would have given future retirees plenty of advance notice.

Increasing payroll taxes threatens to drag down the economy, slow hiring and clobber low-income workers.

Trump is using his only option. He is reducing benefit costs. Any other remedy would require Congress’ cooperation, which is unlikely.

Meanwhile, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and other backers of Medicare for All are making big promises with no way to pay for them. Sanders has proposed several tax hikes, but altogether, they wouldn’t foot the bill for even half the estimated cost of his program. It’s make-believe math.

There is nothing make believe about Medicare Part A’s impending insolvency. Some 61 million seniors depend on Medicare and have no other means of paying their hospital bills. Millions more will become dependent in the next six years.

For White House contenders to ignore this crisis, which will have to be solved during the next presidential term, is a slap in the face to seniors and middle-aged Americans counting on the entitlement.

Betsy McCaughey is a former lieutenant governor of New York.

Source: Read Full Article