Punters and judge see TWO different versions of same photo finish as anger festers over controversial dead-heat call

PUNTER anger over a controversial dead-heat stemmed from TWO different versions of the same photo finish being shown to fans and the judge.

A mysterious 'pure' image of the finish was viewed by judges, while all punters got to see was a 'distorted' one.


And despite fan anger over the dead-heat call, the result has stood.

OFFERS OF THE DAY

Paddy Power: £20 Risk free Bet – CLAIM HERE

Betfair: Bet £5 Get £20 – CLAIM HERE

Paddy Power: £20 Risk Free Bet: New customers only. Place your FIRST bet on any sportsbook market and if it loses we will refund your stake in CASH. Max refund for this offer is £20. Only deposits made using Cards or Apple Pay will qualify for this promotion. T&Cs apply. Paddy's Rewards Club: Get a £10 free bet when you place 5x bets of £10+. T&Cs apply. 18+ Begambleaware.org

Betfair: Bet £5 Get £20: Min £5 bet on the SBK, min odds 1.5 (1/2). Rewards valid for 7 days. Free bets must be placed at min odds of 1.5 (1/2). Exchange free bet limited to certain markets. Payment restrictions apply. T&Cs apply 18+ Begambleaware.org

 

Livid racing fans worked themselves into a frenzy over the official result of the last race at Caulfield racecourse in Australia last Saturday.

The heavily-backed even money favourite Defibrillate hit the line alongside 15-1 shot Hang Man.

To the naked eye, it looked absolutely impossible to split the pair.

The result went to stewards and, after a lengthy delay, a dead heat was awarded.

But when the photo finish was shown on social media, Defibrillate backers hit the roof.

They claimed there was a clear gap between their fancy on the outside and Hang Man on the inside.

And their ire intensified after chiefs came out to explain that the judge had seen a previously unreleased 'pure' image of the finish that confirmed the result.

Now released to the public, chiefs have scrambled to defend their decision and explained how confusion arose.

Robert Cram – chairman of Stewards Racing Victoria – explained what happened as a result of the two different images.

He said: "The situation is we have a high definition camera being used by the judge.

"He has all the tools available to him to view the images, that's a digital image and the pure form of it is from the camera straight to the computer.

"A converted PAL image goes on TV monitors – that is a slightly different image to what the judge is seeing.

"The pure form is much sharper but it has to be converted into a PAL image to go on TV screens.

"When you inflate it [the PAL version] you do get distortion coming onto TV screens.

"Ideally it would be better if the image the judge is using can be transmitted straight onto other networks and TV monitors, I would agree with that."

Punters were less than convinced, however.

One said: "Why wait till today?! Surely this image could have been put out after."

Another posted: "Is it just me or does Defibrillate still clearly win this? Can see nostril over the line."

FREE BETS GET OVER £2,000 IN SIGN UP OFFERS HERE

Commercial content notice: Taking one of the bookmaker offers featured in this article may result in a payment to The Sun. 18+. T&Cs apply. Begambleaware.org

Remember to gamble responsibly

A responsible gambler is someone who:

  • Establishes time and monetary limits before playing
  • Only gambles with money they can afford to lose
  • Never chase their losses
  • Doesn’t gamble if they’re upset, angry or depressed
  • Gamcare – www.gamcare.org.uk
  • Gamble Aware – www.begambleaware.org

Source: Read Full Article