Industrial tower on former Redcar steelworks site WILL be demolished after new culture secretary Nadine Dorries quashed last-minute conservation listing by Historic England

• Teesside’s Dorman Long Tower set for demolition after Nadine Dorries’ call 
• Middlesbrough’s 1955 industrial landmark was granted Grade-II status last week
• But Conservative mayor Ben Houchen appealed, and the new Culture Secretary today gave the green light for the concrete tower to now be flattened 

An historic industrial tower is set to be demolished just a week after it was granted Grade-II status after the new Culture Secretary deemed it did not ‘merit’ a protected listing. 

Teesside’s Dorman Long Tower in Middlesbrough, a 1955 industrial landmark that once served as a central cog in the region’s Redcar steel production, looks set to be fully destroyed after Nadine Dorries removed its listed status.

Historic England had granted the tower Grade-II protected status, meaning it is considered of special interest and should be preserved, just a week ago to the delight of campaigners who hope to see it saved.  

But in one of her first acts in her new ministerial role, Ms Dorries today confirmed Dorman Long Tower can be flattened after an appeal was lodged by Tees Valley Conservative Mayor Ben Houchen.

Developers had planned to bulldoze the 183ft tower this weekend, but now appear to be preparing that work to begin in a few weeks time.

The industrial landmark, renowned by those interested in brutalist architecture, was primarily used a coal silo and control room in the 1950s 

The 183ft Dorman Long Tower in Middlesbrough had been granted Grade-II listed status last weekend

But in one of her first acts as new Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries argued the iconic landmark did not ‘merit’ protected status

Tees Valley Conservative Mayor Ben Houchen said removing the tower, an example of brutalist architecture, will allow major redevelopment plans on the former steelworks site in Redcar to go ahead unhindered.

Only last Friday, Historic England granted the tower Grade II Listed status – a decision Mr Houchen said was a mistake. 

The mayor held meetings over the weekend to challenge the listed status and an appeal was lodged with Historic England on Sunday evening, with the application also sent to the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport.

Middlesbrough’s Dorman Long Tower was built in 1955 as part of the Dorman Long & Co steelwork site.  

The 183ft concrete structure was primarily used to store coal for the region’s vaunted steel production. 

It also served as a firefighting water tower, and control room before the company was nationalised in 1967 – forming part of British Steel. 

The 183ft Dorman Long Tower was primarily used to store coal for Teesside’s vaunted steel production

Despite being disused for decades, the landmark is said to be recognised by experts for its brutalist architecture.  

Campaigners have fought to defend the site and claim it is an essential part of Teesside’s industrial history.

It had been set for demolition in 2021 after decades of disrepair, but was awarded emergency Grade-II listed status by Historic England.

Dorman Long & Co was one of Britain’s biggest public steel producers for more than a century – who built Sydney’s famous Harbour Bridge in 1932. 

Campaigners have long fought to defend the site and claim it is an essential part of Teesside’s industrial history. 

The mayor said his team’s appeal has now succeeded and demolition can go ahead in the coming weeks.

They claimed listing the tower had cost taxpayers between £40,000 to 50,000 and would have jeopardised future development plans for the area.   

He said if the appeal had not been successful, it would have cost more than £9 million to maintain the structure, only for it to eventually be brought down for safety reasons due to its poor state.

Historic England says it accepts that demolition of the tower is ‘now likely to proceed’.  

Mr Houchen said: ‘Following the submission of an appeal on Sunday the 12th of September, I can now confirm Historic England and the new Secretary of State have overturned the listing of Dorman Long Tower.

‘Approving our appeal was the first decision of the new Secretary of State, this goes to show just how important the successful redevelopment of the Redcar former steelworks site is to everyone in government.

‘This reverses the decision on its Grade II listing made after an application by local activists that, if allowed to stand, would have cost the taxpayer in excess of £9 million.

‘That’s money that would not be spent on the creation of jobs, the NHS, transport and other important services.

‘Worse than that, it would have cost thousands of jobs and hundreds of millions of pounds of investment that we were – and still are – trying to bring to the site where Dorman Long Tower currently stands.

‘Historic England has accepted that the listing was a mistake, it was made by a junior officer who agreed the listing without ever seeing the structure itself.

‘The application that was made was inaccurate, incomplete and misleading and would have put the progress and jobs at risk.

‘I would like to send a message to those that think trying to stop these developments is the right thing to do – our heritage does not lie in a rotting coal bunker, our heritage lies in the people that built this great region.’

A Historic England spokesperson said: ‘We recognise the importance of the public benefits that will come from the remediation and planned regeneration of the whole Teesworks site.

‘We also accept, with regret, that demolition of the tower is now likely to proceed but we are keen to continue supporting local partners as works progress.’

Despite being disused for decades, the 183ft landmark (pictured) is said to be recognised by experts for its ‘brutalist’ style

Despite being disused for decades, the 183ft landmark is said to be recognised by experts for its ‘brutalist’ style. 

Spawned from the modernist architectural movement, Brutalism is a style of architecture defined by concrete fortress-like buildings which flourished between the 1950s and mid-1970s.

Brutalist architecture is loved and hated in equal measure, with plans to demolish the monolith structures often confronted with campaigns to save them.

Examples of the typically linear style include London’s Southbank Centre, which houses the Haywood Gallery, and the Grade-II listed Centre Point at the bottom of Tottenham Court Road.

Initially the style, which often features an ‘unfinished concrete’ look was used for government buildings, low-rent housing and shopping centres to create functional structures at a low cost, but eventually designers adopted the look for other uses including arts centres and libraries.

Critics of the style find it unappealing due to its ‘cold’ appearance, and many of the buildings have become symbols of urban decay, coated in graffiti.

Despite this, Brutalism is appreciated by others, with many buildings having received Listed status.

English architects Alison and Peter Smithson were believed to have coined the term in 1953, from the French béton brut, or ‘raw concrete’, although Swedish architect Hans Asplund clained he used the term in a conversation in 1950.

The term became more widely used in 1966 when British architectural critic Reyner Banham used it in the title of his book, The New Brutalism: Ethic Or Aesthetic?

What is Brutalist architecture? Navigating the concrete jungle of blocky, monolithic structures

Brutal: Centre Point in London is one of the city’s many examples of Brutalist architecture 

Spawned from the modernist architectural movement, Brutalism is a style of architecture defined by concrete fortress-like buildings which flourished between the 1950s and mid-1970s.

Brutalist architecture is loved and hated in equal measure, with plans to demolish the monolith structures often confronted with campaigns to save them.

Examples of the typically linear style include London’s Southbank Centre, which houses the Haywood Gallery, and the Grade-II listed Centre Point at the bottom of Tottenham Court Road.

Initially the style, which often features an ‘unfinished concrete’ look was used for government buildings, low-rent housing and shopping centres to create functional structures at a low cost, but eventually designers adopted the look for other uses including arts centres and libraries.

Critics of the style find it unappealing due to its ‘cold’ appearance, and many of the buildings have become symbols of urban decay, coated in graffiti.

Despite this, Brutalism is appreciated by others, with many buildings having received Listed status.

English architects Alison and Peter Smithson were believed to have coined the term in 1953, from the French béton brut, or ‘raw concrete’, although Swedish architect Hans Asplund clained he used the term in a conversation in 1950.

The term became more widely used in 1966 when British architectural critic Reyner Banham used it in the title of his book, The New Brutalism: Ethic Or Aesthetic?

Source: Read Full Article